<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d7134549\x26blogName\x3dJonathan\x27s+Liverstone\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://liverstone.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_GB\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://liverstone.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-3181951560992862409', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>
Jonathan's Liverstone

A place of Bile & other Humours.

BlogRoll


Perhaps it's just me.  

Maybe I'm being a bit simple, but isn't the N.Z. legislation kind of *impenetrable*?

I have been given (was "volunteered for") a task of finding out what's needed by ${EMPLOYER} for the "Health and Safety in Employment Act".
Probably simple enough you may say, I thought so too, considering the number of idiots lacking imagination who can get heavily involved in the administration of this OSH stuff.

Now when I need to know about something relating to the internet, it quickly rattles down to reading the RFC to get an authoritive view on (for instance) a particular protocol.
The RFCs define the rules of the internet, & can be read (although the SNMP section seems to be rather ponderous & convoluted).
Anyway, after a bit of digging around the internet, I came up with lots of articles & "Guides", but never the Act itself.
Then I remembered a recent occasion of unsuccessfully trying to find the traffic regulation which I had apparently transgressed. (Something obscure and petty about following road markings.)
So how am I supposed to "know" the rules of the land? Do I absorb them by some sort of social osmosis?

Surely the rules and regulations which govern my (and other's) behaviour, should be freely available.
For instance, I would like to know what that sign on the road-side (with a picture of a drunkenly-weaving car) is really supposed to mean.
If I want to understand a law or act by reading the legaleese, why can't I? I shouldn't have to pay for the right to read these things, I paid (via my taxes) to have them written in the first place!
It's not like there's a copyright on them ... is there?
The internet seems to be a sitter for this kind of information availablity.
If all this stuff *is* available, can someone let me know?

2 Comments:

NZ legislation is online @
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/

the Health and Safety in Employment Act is here.

As far as street signs go, you can get an overview of what the different sorts are here, and a sign-by-sign breakdown of what each specific one means here.

Your one is 'greasy surface'.


Trust the Librarian instinct:
The pointers to the information are good.
The Legislation Web page *has* the Act, but *what a crap* layout. It's all HTML-structured to facilitate drill-down, but no links to "Next Section". Not a document for "reading".
They do say it is an interum site, so I shouldn't be too critical. But this stuff isn't hard, eh?

As for the road-signs:
The Roadecode only gives examples.
Try & find the definition of the "Beware of Toy Trains" sign, or the "Danger of wandering Windsocks" sign.
Seems there is a thing called "Rules" under the Land Transport Act which are a secret 'till you break 'em.
As I've said elsewhere; I suspect that they are NOT published anywhere, as they are
only "informative" signs as opposed to regulatory "compulsory" signs.
(You can't write infringement tickets against them)
:-)


Disclaimer: (I stole this from Internal Affairs.)
All links and references to other websites, organisations or people not within my control are provided for the user's convenience only, and should not be taken as endorsement of those websites, or of the information contained in those websites, nor of organisations or people referred to. I also do not implicitly or impliedly endorse any website, organisation or people who have off-site links to this website.
... But then again; I only link to sites 'cos I see something there that's worth linking to.